Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
6/10/2025, 3:42:10 PM
X
In reply to:
Cass
@Cassienumber45
·
26d
@marwilliamson @enslaved1s Dear lord. I think they tried that. It was too much.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
27d
@enslaved1s I would want the local POLICE to step in. Then, if there was still a problem, I would want the GOVERNOR to send in the National Guard. I would realize that sending in federal help (much less military!) could be so heavy-handed as to make the situation worse, more volatile, more
enslaved1s
@enslaved1s
·
27d
@marwilliamson If newsome would of brought out the national guard in the first place it wouldn't be needed.

Marianne. I have respect for you so please don't take this the wrong way. If your neighborhood looked like la. I'm sure you would want the marines to come protect you.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
27d
I feel the energy shifting. No matter what our politics, most Americans know bringing the military out to control these protests is an overreach at best and betrayal of our Constitution at worst.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the appropriate use of military and police forces in response to civil unrest, a significant public issue. The tone is dismissive, suggesting disagreement with the previous assertion that an attempt was made to address the situation.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the previous point without providing reasoning or engaging in a meaningful discussion, which could be seen as a missed opportunity for constructive dialogue. [-1]