Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
6/10/2025, 4:45:24 PM
X
In reply to:
one more Ass
@N1000Ice1
·
26d
@marwilliamson Wrong most Americans see the failure of the sanctuary city ideology! One thing all Americans can agree on is that federal laws should be followed! Federal agents shouldn’t be assaulted and criminals must be dealt with in a way that doesn’t encourage crime
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
26d
I feel the energy shifting. No matter what our politics, most Americans know bringing the military out to control these protests is an overreach at best and betrayal of our Constitution at worst.

The statement engages in a discussion about federal law and its adherence, which is a public issue related to governance and constitutional interpretation. The tone is assertive, pointing out a perceived failure to follow federal law.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as accusatory, which might indirectly contribute to a divisive tone.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather focuses on the issue of law adherence, which aligns with constructive dialogue. [+1]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a discussion about constitutional matters, using the platform to express a viewpoint on public policy. [+1]