In reply to:
Hilmi
@hilmi_k_ahmad
·
25d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
25d
The statement 'Vance is worse' is a brief reply in a conversation about political figures and the concept of dictatorship. It engages with public discourse by contributing to a discussion on political leadership and governance, which are public issues.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but it is dismissive and lacks constructive engagement, which could be seen as a minor violation of striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the person it criticizes, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it simply labels someone as 'worse' without providing reasoning or engaging in discussion, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.