Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement comments on a judicial decision regarding the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles, which is a public issue related to governance and civil rights. The tone is supportive of the judge's decision, indicating a stance on the matter.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and simply expresses agreement with a legal decision, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By expressing agreement with the judge's decision, the statement implicitly supports the rule of law and the protection of civil rights, promoting understanding and empathy for those potentially affected by the deployment. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue rather than individuals. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses free speech to express a viewpoint on a public issue, doing so responsibly without misinformation or inflammatory language. [+1]