Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critical commentary on Israel's military actions and policies in the Middle East, specifically mentioning actions in Iran, Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria. It uses strong language to describe these actions, suggesting they are aggressive and unjustified. The tone is accusatory and the intent appears to be to raise awareness or criticize these actions as part of a broader public debate on international relations and military ethics.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions or contributing to a polarized discourse. This could be considered a violation of the principle to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the strong language could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of those involved, particularly if it generalizes or misrepresents the actions of a nation or its people. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on condemnation rather than dialogue or solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging potential complexities or engaging with opposing perspectives. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as the strong language and lack of nuance could contribute to misinformation or heightened tensions. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.