Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement involves a report on international relations and potential military actions, which are significant public issues. It discusses the coordination between Israeli and US officials regarding a military strike, touching on themes of transparency, international diplomacy, and public deception.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but reports on actions that could have significant consequences. It is neutral in this regard.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech. It reports on official actions and statements. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a factual report on a sensitive issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It reports on claims made by officials, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about significant international actions, contributing to public awareness and debate. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly reporting on a matter of public interest, maintaining journalistic integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.