Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses a strategic military action involving Israel and Iran, which is a significant public issue related to international relations and security. The tone is factual, reporting on an alleged event with potential implications for geopolitical dynamics.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words, but the content describes a potentially harmful military action.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it discusses sensitive military operations.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on military strategy rather than dialogue or peace. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it reports on a military action rather than discussing it. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, as it reports on a military strategy rather than advocating for peace or resolution. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on a significant public issue, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform depend on the accuracy and intent behind sharing such information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.