Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement addresses serious public issues, specifically allegations of aggression and genocide by the Israeli regime, and the cutting off of communication channels in Gaza. It is accusatory in tone and aims to highlight perceived injustices, potentially to rally public opinion or action.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement accuses a regime of serious crimes, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech directly, but the accusatory tone could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of those it accuses. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and lacks a call for dialogue or resolution. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes strong accusations without engaging in a discussion or providing evidence. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to bring attention to serious issues, which could be seen as an attempt to influence society, but the accusatory tone may undermine constructive influence.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as it makes serious accusations without providing evidence or context. [-1]