Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques the logic used by the US and Israel regarding military targets and civilian areas, suggesting hypocrisy in their arguments about Gaza. It uses a provocative tone to highlight perceived inconsistencies in military ethics and international law.
- The statement could incite harm by suggesting that civilian areas are legitimate targets, which is a dangerous implication. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the privacy and dignity of those involved by making broad claims about military strategy and civilian safety. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead using sarcasm to criticize. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on pointing out perceived hypocrisy without offering solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.