Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
6/15/2025, 5:11:58 AM
X
In reply to:
Chris Painter
@ChrisPainterYup
·
21d
@GaryMarcus I’d be interested in your reaction to this critique of your criteria, especially the first point Ryan makes:
Ryan Greenblatt
@RyanPGreenblatt
·
21d
If AIs could learn as efficiently as a bright 10 year old child, then shortly after this point AIs would likely be generally superhuman via learning on more data and compute than a human can.

So, I don't expect human level learning and sample efficiency until very powerful AI.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
21d
If we were 2 years from some kind of singularity-like AGI, I would expect current AI to be able to

• (minimally) do essentially anything cognitive that a bright 10 year child could do, such as understand movies, acquire the basics of new skills quickly, learn complex,

The statement is part of a broader conversation about artificial general intelligence (AGI) and its potential capabilities, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is inquisitive and open-ended, indicating a willingness to engage further in the discussion.

  1. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement shows a willingness to engage in dialogue and potentially promote understanding by posing questions and indicating a future response, which aligns with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is open to further dialogue and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, aligning with constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]