Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques Elon Musk for allegedly making an unfounded claim about a political affiliation of an assassin, contrasting it with the actual details of the incident. The tone is critical and somewhat accusatory, questioning Musk's judgment.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a critical tone that could be seen as harsh.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but questions the actions of a public figure.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and includes a personal attack by questioning 'wtf is wrong with Elon?' which is an ad hominem argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.