In reply to:
Flowers ☾ ❂
@flowersslop
·
26d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
26d
The statement critiques the progress of AI in misinformation detection, referencing a promise made by Mark Zuckerberg to the U.S. Senate. It engages in public discourse by addressing the societal issue of misinformation and the role of technology companies in combating it.
- The statement does not directly harm others but critiques the lack of progress in AI solutions for misinformation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the challenges in AI misinformation detection, though it could be more empathetic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Zuckerberg's progress on AI solutions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By highlighting the issue of misinformation detection, the statement uses influence to draw attention to a societal concern. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing a public figure's actions in a public forum. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.