The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the societal issue of attitudes towards artificial general intelligence (AGI) and the perspectives of 'doomers' who are concerned about its imminent arrival. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive of the 'doomer' perspective, suggesting that their beliefs are not based on evidence but rather on a fixed mindset.
- The statement does not directly harm others, but its dismissive tone could contribute to a polarized discourse, which may indirectly cause harm by entrenching divisions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards those with differing views, as it dismisses their concerns without engaging with them constructively. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It generalizes and dismisses a group of people ('doomers') without addressing specific arguments or evidence, which could be seen as a form of ad hominem argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.