In reply to:
Vlad Ciobanu
@vlad3ciobanu
·
33d
The statement engages in a public discourse about the potential timelines for artificial general intelligence (AGI) development, responding to a conversation about the assumptions and evidence surrounding AGI progress. The tone is critical and dismissive, focusing on perceived comprehension failures and lack of evidence for long timelines.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses dismissive language that could be perceived as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of 'stupid errors' could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses opposing views without constructive engagement. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses opposing views without addressing them substantively. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.