Gary Marcus

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 113
6/15/2025, 2:51:07 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
38d
@VraserX @shaunralston also lots of things in the picture i never said. it’s really dishonest.
VraserX e/acc
@VraserX
·
38d
Gary Marcus has spent the last 5 years confidently predicting things that aged worse than milk in the sun.
🧢 “Scaling laws don’t work”
🧢 “GPT-4 is the end”
🧢 “Deep learning hit a wall”
🧢 “LLMs will never understand meaning”

Meanwhile, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI and

The statement is part of a public discourse involving a debate on AI predictions and representations. The tone is confrontational, with a demand for an apology and a threat to block if not met. The initial conversation involves accusations of misrepresentation, which can be seen as a call for accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is confrontational and ultimatum-based. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in a form of cyberbullying by threatening to block over disagreements. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to threats rather than discussion. [-1]