Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 112
6/15/2025, 3:07:46 PM
X
In reply to:
VraserX e/acc
@VraserX
·
41d
@GaryMarcus @shaunralston “Apologize or I’ll block you”? Seriously, Gary? You made public claims, I replied with facts. Blocking isn’t debate, it’s retreat. If your ideas can’t survive disagreement, maybe they were never that solid to begin with.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
41d
@VraserX @shaunralston if you don’t apologize for all these misrepresentations I will
block you.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
41d
@VraserX @shaunralston also lots of things in the picture i never said. it’s really dishonest.
VraserX e/acc
@VraserX
·
41d
Gary Marcus has spent the last 5 years confidently predicting things that aged worse than milk in the sun.
🧢 “Scaling laws don’t work”
🧢 “GPT-4 is the end”
🧢 “Deep learning hit a wall”
🧢 “LLMs will never understand meaning”

Meanwhile, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI and

The statement involves a disagreement over alleged misrepresentations and the decision to block someone on social media. The tone is defensive and accusatory, focusing on the perceived distortion of views rather than engaging in constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement accuses others of lying and distorting views, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy by not engaging in personal attacks but does accuse others of malice.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, opting instead to block the other party. [-1]