Gary Marcus

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 18
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
63d
Terence Tao reporting on the same problem we have seen endlessly in other domains: LLM’s produce output that “looks” correct but is often deeply wrong and even stupid on careful inspection.

I know of no domain in which this is NOT the case.

And yet people seem surprised over
6/15/2025, 8:38:19 PM
X
In reply to:
Vlad Ciobanu
@vlad3ciobanu
·
63d
@GaryMarcus automating programming and mathematics formalization should not be underestimated
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
63d
If we were 2 years from some kind of singularity-like AGI, I would expect current AI to be able to

• (minimally) do essentially anything cognitive that a bright 10 year child could do, such as understand movies, acquire the basics of new skills quickly, learn complex,

The statement engages in a discussion about the capabilities and limitations of AI, particularly in automating programming and mathematics. It suggests that these areas should not be underestimated, implying a need for careful consideration and further exploration. The tone is analytical and contributes to the broader discourse on AI development and its implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and encourages a thoughtful approach to AI capabilities. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of not underestimating AI's potential in specific fields. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages constructively with the ongoing discussion about AI's current limitations and future potential. [+1]