In reply to:
Jillian Michaels
@JillianMichaels
·
10d
The statement engages in public discourse by questioning the Trump administration's policies on immigration, specifically regarding work visas, asylum reform, and legal pathways. It is part of a broader conversation about immigration enforcement and its impact on families, which is a significant public issue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but questions the actions of the administration, which is a neutral stance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement seeks to promote understanding by asking for clarification on policies, which aligns with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue by asking a question rather than making personal attacks, adhering to constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to question public policy responsibly, upholding free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.