Gary Marcus

Rank 24 of 47
|
Score 23
6/16/2025, 1:38:24 PM
X
In reply to:
Timothy Nguyen
@IAmTimNguyen
·
63d
@GaryMarcus This is unfair. Terry Tao has suggestions and a vision for how AIs can be used successfully, which he even eludes to this in the very same video clip. Elsewhere, Terry writes:

"I expect, say, 2026-level AI, when used properly, will be a trustworthy co-author in mathematical
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
64d
Terence Tao reporting on the same problem we have seen endlessly in other domains: LLM’s produce output that “looks” correct but is often deeply wrong and even stupid on careful inspection.

I know of no domain in which this is NOT the case.

And yet people seem surprised over
vitrupo
@vitrupo
·
64d
Terence Tao says today's AIs pass the eye test -- but fail miserably on the smell test.

They generate proofs that look flawless. But the mistakes are subtle, and strangely inhuman.

“There's a metaphorical mathematical smell.. it's not clear how to get AI to duplicate that.”

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the current state and future potential of AI, particularly in relation to its application in mathematics. It acknowledges the limitations of AI as highlighted by Terence Tao and others, while also suggesting a fair assessment of AI's current capabilities. The tone is neutral and open to future developments.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and maintains a neutral tone, acknowledging both current limitations and potential future improvements. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by recognizing the current state of AI and its potential, fostering a balanced view. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive dialogue by addressing differing opinions without personal attacks. [+1]