Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 71
6/16/2025, 1:51:24 PM
X
In reply to:
David Knopfler đź’™
@DavidKnopfler
·
68d
@GaryMarcus You are right but when you put your hand in a wasp’s nest it’s likely to be stung. You have been endlessly needling OpenAI and Altman - you could ease up a bit. AI itself can find creative ways to agree with both you and Altman and it’s frankly intelligent and refreshing
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
69d
people lie about me and distort my views all the time. this is a good example.

This is dishonest, full of distortions and incorrect.
1. I predicted specifically that pretraining scaling would run out and that we would need new innovations. it did and we have and still do. I
VraserX e/acc
@VraserX
·
69d
Gary Marcus has spent the last 5 years confidently predicting things that aged worse than milk in the sun.
🧢 “Scaling laws don’t work”
🧢 “GPT-4 is the end”
🧢 “Deep learning hit a wall”
🧢 “LLMs will never understand meaning”

Meanwhile, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI and

The statement questions whether OpenAI and Altman have started behaving as honest actors, implying skepticism about their integrity. It engages in public discourse by addressing the behavior of influential figures in AI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies dishonesty, which could be seen as harmful if unfounded. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It questions the integrity of others, potentially affecting their dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]