In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
69d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the debate around a viral paper and its critiques. It aims to clarify misconceptions and provide a serious analysis, suggesting a focus on promoting understanding and constructive dialogue. The tone is somewhat critical, aiming to correct what the author perceives as misunderstandings.
- The statement aims to clarify misconceptions, which aligns with doing no harm by reducing misinformation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By offering a serious analysis, it promotes understanding and empathy towards the scientific discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques other responses but does not engage in personal attacks, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The author acknowledges the need to correct misunderstandings, aligning with acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.