In reply to:
Jason Stapleton ☕️ ✍🏼 🎙️
@Jason_Stapleton
·
35d
The statement is part of a discussion on the reliability and trustworthiness of AI agents, specifically large language models (LLMs), in comparison to human employees. It engages with the public issue of AI deployment in workplaces and the balance between human and AI capabilities.
- The statement does not cause harm and is a neutral contribution to the discussion, maintaining a respectful tone. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a thoughtful discussion about the balance of human and AI capabilities. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, contributing to a reasoned debate. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly engaging in a public discussion about AI and employment. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.