Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement addresses a public issue concerning the legality and implications of the Trump administration's decision to cancel N.I.H. grants, which is a matter of public concern related to discrimination and funding for minority groups.
- The statement does not use harmful language and presents a factual account of the judge's ruling, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of those involved by focusing on the legal ruling and not engaging in hate speech or harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By highlighting the judge's ruling against discrimination, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for affected minority groups. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement presents a factual account without personal attacks, adhering to constructive dialogue principles. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about a significant legal ruling, contributing to societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly reporting on a legal matter with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.