In reply to:
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the debate on the potential of superintelligent AI, a significant societal issue. It critiques the current state of AI reasoning models, suggesting they are not close to surpassing human intelligence.
- The statement does not cause harm and contributes to a balanced discussion on AI capabilities. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by providing a reasoned argument against the imminent rise of superintelligent AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI advancements without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.