The statement discusses the performance of LLMs compared to expert coders on a new benchmark, highlighting the limitations of LLMs when data contamination is controlled. It suggests that LLMs struggle with hard programming problems, which expert humans excel at.
- The statement does not cause harm but highlights a limitation of LLMs, which can be seen as constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing insights into the capabilities and limitations of LLMs. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out specific areas where LLMs fall short without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.