Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47

Score 64

Reposted by Gary Marcus

@llmvibes @sama unless we solve the problems of distribution shift that i pointed out nearly 30 years ago, we will never get to AGI.

unless we follow the path towards neurosymbolic AI I laid down, we will never get to AGI.

science isn’t a popularity contest.

6/16/2025, 10:06:50 PM

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing significant issues in AI development, specifically the challenges of distribution shift and the potential path towards neurosymbolic AI. The tone is assertive and somewhat critical, emphasizing the importance of scientific rigor over popularity.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to highlight important scientific challenges, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by focusing on constructive criticism of AI development paths. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by discussing specific technical issues in AI, though it could be more empathetic in tone. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of current AI approaches, but the tone could be perceived as dismissive towards others' contributions. [-1]