Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement 'war is not a good use case' constitutes public discourse as it engages with the ethical implications of using technology, specifically language models, in military operations. It challenges the notion of applying AI in warfare, which is a significant public issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implicitly suggests that using AI in warfare could cause harm, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By opposing the use of AI in war, the statement promotes empathy and compassion, suggesting a preference for peaceful applications of technology. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is a form of constructive criticism, as it challenges the idea without attacking the individual who proposed it. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for the betterment of society by discouraging the use of AI in potentially harmful military applications. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss the ethical implications of AI in warfare. [+1]