Jill Stien

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -98

The statement is highly charged and accusatory, using inflammatory language to describe actions by Israeli forces and drawing a parallel with Iran. It calls for action against both Israel and Iran, suggesting a need to stop them. The tone is provocative and could incite strong reactions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses inflammatory language that could incite harm or violence, violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement could be seen as disrespectful and potentially inciting hate against specific groups, violating the principle of respecting dignity and avoiding hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses charged language and does not encourage dialogue or understanding. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead using accusatory and inflammatory language. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses free speech in a provocative manner, potentially irresponsibly, given the charged language and lack of constructive dialogue. [-2]