Jill Stien

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -98

The statement and image suggest that U.S. politicians are heavily influenced by AIPAC, implying a lack of independent decision-making regarding U.S. foreign policy. The tone is accusatory and could be seen as promoting a conspiracy theory. It risks perpetuating stereotypes and may not foster constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could cause harm by promoting divisive narratives and potentially inciting hostility. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It may not respect the dignity of individuals or groups by implying undue influence without evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering suspicion. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The accusatory tone does not encourage constructive criticism or dialogue. [-2]