Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement critiques a media story for not mentioning a past prediction made by an individual about AI replacing radiologists. It questions the credibility of the person's current claims by highlighting a previous incorrect prediction.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to hold the media accountable, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by promoting accurate information. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the omission of relevant past information, but it could be seen as a personal attack on the individual's credibility. [-1]