Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the reception of a joke rebuttal to an Apple LLM paper, suggesting that AI enthusiasts are not critically evaluating content. It implies a concern about the impact of AI on public discourse and intelligence.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but critiques a group, which could be seen as indirectly harmful by suggesting they are becoming 'dumber.' [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does generalize about a group ('AI stans'), which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it mocks a group for their perceived lack of critical thinking. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a mocking tone rather than fostering discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to critique a societal issue (AI's impact on discourse), but the tone could be more responsible and constructive.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.