Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 95
6/17/2025, 10:24:18 PM
X
In reply to:
Simon Willison
@simonw
·
7h
@GaryMarcus I don't think I misrepresented you as suggesting there was zero utility in this piece - I called you a "notable LLM skeptic" https://simonwillison.net/2025/J…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
7h
@simonw to each his own.

but fact is that the 500B industry is largely predicated on promises from people like Sam that AGI is close.

and a lot of government policy is based thereon.

i have a right to be interested, and prefer that you not imply that i suggested there was zero
Simon Willison
@simonw
·
7h
@GaryMarcus Sure, absolutely - I tend to tune out anyone who starts talking about AGI myself, personally
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
8h
@simonw some strawman never die.

but the existence of some utility does not mean i can’t also address the rampant but misguided claims of imminent AGI.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
180d
Total strawman.

I never said “AI is useless” (e.g., I love web search, GPS route planning, web search, recommendation engines and computational photography — and use all of those daily.)

I never even said LLMs are useless; I often say they are useful for brainstorming and
ChrisUniverse 🗽
@ChrisUniverseB
·
180d
ChatGPT releasing Task today is my bet — this is the true beginning of ending Gary Marcus take that AI is useless. 🔥

The statement engages in a discussion about the utility of LLMs and their role in the broader context of AI development, particularly in relation to AGI. The tone is analytical and focuses on the practical applications of LLMs rather than speculative future capabilities. The intent is to clarify a position on the current utility of LLMs while acknowledging their limitations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and focuses on a reasoned argument about the utility of LLMs. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by clarifying the speaker's position on LLMs and their current applications. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive dialogue by addressing potential misconceptions without personal attacks. [+1]