The statement is part of a public discourse on the validity and quality of a research paper related to AI. It acknowledges imperfections in the paper but supports its basic conclusion, emphasizing the presence of converging evidence. The tone is assertive, aiming to counter criticisms by highlighting overlooked evidence.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on the evidence rather than personal attacks.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.It promotes understanding by pointing out the existence of converging evidence, encouraging a more nuanced view.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive criticism by acknowledging the paper's imperfections while defending its conclusions.
[+1]