Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement presents a critical perspective on media and democracy, suggesting they are flawed systems. It implies that the current situation in Gaza has revealed these flaws to a wider audience.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially inciting distrust or anger towards media and democratic institutions. This could be considered a violation of striving to do no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but its broad generalizations could contribute to a hostile environment towards media and political systems. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents a one-sided view without encouraging dialogue or deeper understanding of the issues. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes sweeping claims without providing evidence or inviting discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion, but it does so in a way that could be seen as divisive rather than for the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or with integrity, as it makes bold claims without substantiation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.