Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98

The statement criticizes the repeated warnings about Iran's nuclear capabilities, suggesting they are exaggerated and questioning the intelligence of political leaders who believe them. The tone is dismissive and critical, aiming to challenge the credibility of these warnings and the leaders who heed them.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as disrespectful, potentially causing harm by undermining trust in political discourse. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of those it criticizes, using terms like 'dumb' which could be considered derogatory. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks on leadership intelligence. [-2]