Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
6/18/2025, 5:22:10 PM
X
In reply to:
Harlan Stewart
@HumanHarlan
·
19d
@volatrader @GaryMarcus Plenty of the humans who would answer incorrectly are perfectly capable of doing economically useful tasks
volatrader
@volatrader
·
19d
@HumanHarlan @GaryMarcus That's the idiot test, as in "can we build an artificial idiot?"

Yes you can. But would that be the good for?
Harlan Stewart
@HumanHarlan
·
19d
@GaryMarcus There are plenty of humans who would answer incorrectly if asked whether a brick and feather would fall at the same speed on the moon
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
19d
what on earth, er, um, on moon, kind of physics engine is that?
Wyatt Walls
@lefthanddraft
·
19d
@emollick simulate physics well?

veo 3: "An astronaut on the moon drops a brick and a feather at the same time and watches them fall to the surface"

The statement is part of a lighthearted and humorous conversation about physics and AI capabilities. It critiques exaggerated claims about AI while acknowledging its usefulness. The tone is informal and slightly sarcastic, focusing on the limitations of AI in simulating complex tasks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is part of a playful exchange. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by acknowledging AI's capabilities and limitations. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]