Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47

Score 64

@flowersslop i think your quick dismissal doesn’t at all engage in the facts reported in the OpenAI files, my substack, @_KarenHao’s book, etc, nor the facts that many others with less financial interests have become distrustful as well.

6/19/2025, 3:31:48 PM

In reply to:

Flowers ☾ ❂

@flowersslop

21d

@GaryMarcus The fact that they are all trying to achieve AGI themselves as quickly as possible and would therefore benefit from distrusting OpenAI is of course pure coincidence and does not make them biased at all.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

21d

Honestly, should anyone?

Chana

@ChanaMessinger

22d

Wow the AI space is truly in large part a list of people who don't trust Sam Altman

The statement engages in a discussion about trust and bias in the AI industry, specifically regarding OpenAI and its leadership. It challenges the dismissal of concerns by pointing to various sources and individuals who have expressed distrust, suggesting that financial interests may not be the sole reason for skepticism.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement attempts to engage with reported facts and sources, which aligns with striving to do no harm by promoting informed discussion. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
By referencing multiple sources and individuals, the statement seeks to promote understanding and empathy for differing viewpoints. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by challenging a dismissal and encouraging consideration of reported facts, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]