Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The conversation critiques trust in AI leadership, particularly Sam Altman, and discusses the influence of former OpenAI members and investors. It questions the trustworthiness of AI leaders and the motivations behind AI investments.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement questions trust in AI leaders, which could be seen as potentially harmful if not substantiated, but it does not directly harm individuals.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects privacy but could border on personal critique, especially regarding trustworthiness. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The discussion promotes understanding of concerns in the AI industry, encouraging scrutiny of leadership and investment motivations. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue engages in criticism but avoids personal attacks, focusing on professional trustworthiness. [+1]