Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47

Score 64

Are people reading this tweet realizing that this is NOT the widely-discussed “illusion of thinking” paper, but an earlier paper by a separate group of authors that also happen to be at Apple?

Dan Hendrycks

@DanHendrycks

24d

Apple recently published a paper showing that current AI systems lack the ability to solve puzzles that are easy for humans.
Humans: 92.7%
GPT-4o: 69.9%

However, they didn't evaluate on any recent reasoning models.
If they did, they'd find that
o3 gets 96.5%, beating humans.

6/19/2025, 7:23:09 PM

The statement clarifies a misunderstanding about a research paper, emphasizing the importance of accurate information in discussions about AI capabilities. It aims to correct a potential misinterpretation of research findings, which is crucial for informed public discourse.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by correcting misinformation, which is essential for accurate public understanding. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
By clarifying the distinction between two different papers, the statement promotes understanding and accuracy in the discussion of AI research. [+1]
Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
The statement acknowledges a potential mistake in the interpretation of the research papers and seeks to correct it. [+1]