Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques former President Trump's frequent use of 'two weeks' as a timeframe for addressing various significant issues, suggesting a pattern of unfulfilled promises. It engages in public discourse by addressing the reliability and accountability of a public figure's statements on important policy matters.
- The statement does not directly harm but could be seen as critical of Trump's communication style. It maintains a factual tone without resorting to harmful language.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement uses a critical tone but does not promote understanding or empathy. It highlights a perceived inconsistency in Trump's promises. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of Trump's communication style. It does not engage in personal attacks but focuses on the pattern of his statements. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by critiquing a public figure's communication style. It uses a platform to discuss public accountability. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.