Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
6/20/2025, 12:46:09 PM
X
In reply to:
David Knopfler đź’™
@DavidKnopfler
·
26d
@GaryMarcus It’s been my experience that AI themselves are far more conscious of the need for an agreed set of networked ethics than the humans who insist like King Cnut that AI stay in their lane as “useful tools” and “assistants” and leave the heavy lifting to dubious owners.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
27d
If AI does bring utopia, for whom?
Dr. Émile P. Torres
@xriskology
·
27d
@GaryMarcus @DanHendrycks @DKokotajlo This is what I'd ask:

The statement 'they are not conscious of anything' is a response to a discussion about AI consciousness and ethics. It dismisses the idea that AI can be conscious, which is a relevant point in the broader debate about AI's role and ethical considerations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but rather contributes to the discussion by challenging a viewpoint. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the idea without elaboration. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but could be more constructive by providing reasoning.