Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
6/20/2025, 6:57:23 PM
X
In reply to:
Atanas Stankov
@neuro_nasko
·
209d
@GaryMarcus @DanHendrycks @DKokotajlo Was the implausibility of AGI ever raised? Any panels with for-profit experts are automatically biased towards AGI being inevitable.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
210d
Later today @DanHendrycks @DKokotajlo and myself will be recording a conversation on AI safety and AGI timelines.

Have questions for us? Drop them in the comments below.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and its plausibility, which is a significant public issue related to technology and its future impact on society. The tone is informative and seeks to clarify the consensus among panel members regarding AGI timelines.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is neutral in tone, simply reporting on the panel's consensus. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the panel's position on AGI plausibility and timelines. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a question about the panel's discussion without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]