Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
The statement by Tlaib addresses a public issue concerning the allocation of government funds, specifically criticizing a bill that allegedly reduces funding for critical programs in favor of increasing military spending. This is a substantive engagement with public policy and budgetary priorities, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to use harmful language but rather critiques a policy decision, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the implications of the bill, potentially fostering empathy for those affected by the cuts to critical programs. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is a critique of a policy rather than a personal attack, adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By raising awareness about the bill's impact, the statement uses influence to potentially advocate for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.