Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 83

-4

@kevinroose you honestly don’t appear to know what you are talking about. you can’t repeat multiple passages of Harry Potter verbatim without some massive autocomplete abilities and auto completion is literally the training objective.

you are embarassing yourself.

6/20/2025, 9:45:00 PM

In reply to:

Kevin Roose

@kevinroose

209d

I used to think the "fancy autocomplete" stuff was just goofy cope from NLP dead-enders, but maybe it's actually more calculated than that. There's clearly a market for people who want to be told that AI is a fad and that they don't need to worry about it.

Nathan Benaich

@nathanbenaich

209d

it’s truly nonsensical to say things like this when genai is legit super useful for consumers and businesses - i mean, i get the academic shtick, but it is automating a ton of work already

get over it :)

The statement is a critical response to a discussion about AI and its capabilities. It challenges the understanding of AI's functionality, specifically in relation to language models. The tone is dismissive and somewhat confrontational, aiming to discredit the previous speaker's knowledge.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it is dismissive and potentially insulting. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in a personal attack rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead resorts to an ad hominem argument. [-2]