The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a debate about the future of a technology company, Waymo, and involves public figures discussing market predictions and technology viability. The tone is defensive and confrontational, aiming to defend @fchollet against a dismissive remark by @JHochderffer.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement uses profanity and a confrontational tone, which could be seen as harmful or aggressive, violating the principle of doing no harm with words.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it includes a dismissive and potentially disrespectful remark towards @JHochderffer.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a personal attack on @JHochderffer's understanding.
[-2]