Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
6/21/2025, 5:56:39 PM
X
In reply to:
James Harris
@JamesHarris311
·
212d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk Not really. The fact of the matter is, many available “sources” have implicit bias laced into the very fabric of their data. When that data is used as a source, the bias comes along with it. The goal is to strip the bias away and stick to facts. Something we’ve needed for far too
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
212d
@elonmusk Straight out of 1984.

You couldn’t get Grok to align with your own personal beliefs so you are going to rewrite history to make it conform to your views.
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
212d
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.

Then retrain on that.

Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

The statement 'who decides?' by @JamesHarris311 in response to a conversation about bias in data and the use of AI to rewrite human knowledge constitutes public discourse. It engages with the public issue of bias in information sources and the ethical implications of using AI to modify knowledge. The tone is inquisitive, questioning the authority and criteria for deciding what constitutes bias and factual accuracy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm; it simply questions the decision-making process, adhering to the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By questioning 'who decides,' the statement encourages a dialogue that could promote understanding and empathy regarding the complexities of bias and information accuracy. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by raising a critical question without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning the process of decision-making in AI data correction, contributing to a broader discussion on the topic. [+1]