Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement is part of a broader conversation about the integrity and bias of information sources, which is a public issue. The tone is defensive, aiming to clarify a misattribution of a claim about an event. The intent is to correct a perceived misrepresentation in the discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a contentious discussion, so it neither strongly adheres to nor violates this principle.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by clarifying a misattribution without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to this principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement attempts to correct a perceived mistake in the attribution of a claim, aligning with this principle. [+1]