Gary Marcus

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the ethical considerations and potential harm related to decisions made in conflict situations, specifically referencing Gaza. It critiques the decision-making process regarding collateral damage, which is a significant public issue.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement highlights the harm caused by decisions regarding collateral damage, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. It does not directly cause harm but critiques harmful decisions. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement indirectly promotes understanding by bringing attention to the ethical implications of decisions in conflict zones, though it could be more explicit in fostering empathy and compassion. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of decision-making processes without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]