Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement 'Our country is addicted to war' is a critical commentary on national policy and military engagement, which constitutes public discourse. It suggests a critique of the country's foreign policy and military actions, potentially sparking debate on national priorities and ethical considerations.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as provocative. It does not promote violence or harm, so it aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement could promote understanding and empathy by encouraging reflection on the consequences of war, but it lacks explicit calls for compassion or empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a general critique of policy rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to potentially spark debate and reflection on societal issues, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a critical opinion on public policy, using the platform responsibly to engage in civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.