Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a public discourse discussing the implications of military actions and the need for congressional approval, which are significant public issues. The tone is somewhat sarcastic, suggesting skepticism about Iran's response to military actions.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a dismissive attitude towards potential consequences of military actions, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses sarcasm rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not foster constructive criticism or dialogue either.
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement engages in public discourse about military actions and congressional approval, upholding free speech, but the sarcastic tone may not fully align with responsible use of the platform.